Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| LinkedIn for Zoho Analytics | Acefone for Zoho | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | ||
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | LinkedIn for Zoho Analytics | Acefone for Zoho |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 17 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Listed since | Sep 2020 | Apr 2020 |
Based on the data on this page, Acefone for Zoho is the stronger choice for most Zoho Marketplace merchants — 5.0★ vs LinkedIn for Zoho Analytics's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. On pricing, Acefone for Zoho offers a free tier (Free) while LinkedIn for Zoho Analytics starts at Paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly for stores at sub-1K monthly orders where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Acefone for Zoho; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — LinkedIn for Zoho Analytics's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Acefone for Zoho's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zoho Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: LinkedIn for Zoho Analytics audit • Acefone for Zoho audit
Acefone for Zoho is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free). LinkedIn for Zoho Analytics starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Zoho Marketplace marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. LinkedIn for Zoho Analytics fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Acefone for Zoho is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zoho Marketplace marketplace. Acefone for Zoho has more onboarding documentation maturity (17 reviews vs 0), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
LinkedIn for Zoho Analytics typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (0 reviews). Acefone for Zoho aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (17 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. LinkedIn for Zoho Analytics and Acefone for Zoho both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from LinkedIn for Zoho Analytics" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.