Loading content…
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| Sift | Exporter | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Sift | Exporter | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Sift | Exporter |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 7 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free to install | Multiple plans available |
Based on the data on this page, Exporter is the stronger choice for most Zendesk Marketplace support teams — 5.0★ vs Sift's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Sift offers a free tier (Free to install) while Exporter starts at Multiple plans available. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage support teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Exporter; mid-market and enterprise support teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Sift's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Exporter's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zendesk Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Sift audit • Exporter audit
Sift is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free to install). Exporter starts at Multiple plans available. Both publish their pricing on the Zendesk Marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. Exporter does carry the larger published review base (7 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zendesk Marketplace. Exporter has the deeper published review base (7 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Sift typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). Exporter typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (7 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Sift and Exporter both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Sift" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.