Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Past Tickets Search AI by Macha | SAP Litmos | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Assign users to courses, teams or learning paths from within Zendesk.
| Metric | Past Tickets Search AI by Macha | SAP Litmos |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 8 | 5 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free to install | Free to install |
Based on the data on this page, Past Tickets Search AI by Macha is the stronger choice for most Zendesk Marketplace support teams — 5.0★ vs SAP Litmos's 4.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Past Tickets Search AI by Macha at Free to install, SAP Litmos at Free to install. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage support teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Past Tickets Search AI by Macha; mid-market and enterprise support teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — SAP Litmos's 5-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Past Tickets Search AI by Macha's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zendesk Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Past Tickets Search AI by Macha audit • SAP Litmos audit
No tracked changes.
Both Past Tickets Search AI by Macha and SAP Litmos offer paid plans only. Past Tickets Search AI by Macha starts at Free to install; SAP Litmos starts at Free to install. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Past Tickets Search AI by Macha has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 8 reviews) compared to SAP Litmos (4.0★ from 5 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Past Tickets Search AI by Macha holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zendesk Marketplace. Past Tickets Search AI by Macha has the deeper published review base (8 vs 5), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Past Tickets Search AI by Macha typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (8 reviews). SAP Litmos typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (5 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Past Tickets Search AI by Macha and SAP Litmos both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from SAP Litmos" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
