Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Advanced inbound & outbound calling for Sell, beautiful UX, Enterprise quality
| Aircall for Sell | Google Play Reviews | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Integrate reviews from the Google Play store into your Zendesk Support account
| Metric | Aircall for Sell | Google Play Reviews |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 18 | ★ 248 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free to install | Free |
Based on the data on this page, Aircall for Sell is the stronger choice for most Zendesk Marketplace support teams — 5.0★ vs Google Play Reviews's 4.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Aircall for Sell at Free to install, Google Play Reviews at Free. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Google Play Reviews has the larger user base (248 reviews vs 18), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Aircall for Sell's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage support teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Aircall for Sell; mid-market and enterprise support teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Google Play Reviews's 248-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Aircall for Sell's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zendesk Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Aircall for Sell audit • Google Play Reviews audit
No tracked changes.
Both Aircall for Sell and Google Play Reviews offer paid plans only. Aircall for Sell starts at Free to install; Google Play Reviews starts at Free. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Aircall for Sell has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 18 reviews) compared to Google Play Reviews (4.0★ from 248 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Aircall for Sell holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zendesk Marketplace. Google Play Reviews has the deeper published review base (248 vs 18), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Aircall for Sell typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (18 reviews). Google Play Reviews typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (248 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Aircall for Sell and Google Play Reviews both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Aircall for Sell" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
