Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Bulk CC & Followers Remover | TypeGenie Smart Autocomplete | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
The only autocomplete app for Zendesk. Agents type less and resolve faster.
| Metric | Bulk CC & Followers Remover | TypeGenie Smart Autocomplete |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.0 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 2 | ★ 38 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free | Free to install |
Based on the data on this page, TypeGenie Smart Autocomplete is the stronger choice for most Zendesk Marketplace support teams — 5.0★ vs Bulk CC & Followers Remover's 3.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Bulk CC & Followers Remover at Free, TypeGenie Smart Autocomplete at Free to install. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage support teams who need fast install and low risk should default to TypeGenie Smart Autocomplete; mid-market and enterprise support teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Bulk CC & Followers Remover's 2-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than TypeGenie Smart Autocomplete's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zendesk Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Bulk CC & Followers Remover audit • TypeGenie Smart Autocomplete audit
| Keyword | Bulk CC & Followers Remover | TypeGenie Smart Autocomplete |
|---|---|---|
| agents type | Not ranked | #1 |
| autocomplete | Not ranked | #1 |
Both Bulk CC & Followers Remover and TypeGenie Smart Autocomplete offer paid plans only. Bulk CC & Followers Remover starts at Free; TypeGenie Smart Autocomplete starts at Free to install. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
TypeGenie Smart Autocomplete has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 38 reviews) compared to Bulk CC & Followers Remover (3.0★ from 2 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
TypeGenie Smart Autocomplete holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 3.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Zendesk Marketplace. TypeGenie Smart Autocomplete has the deeper published review base (38 vs 2), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Bulk CC & Followers Remover typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (2 reviews). TypeGenie Smart Autocomplete typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (38 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Bulk CC & Followers Remover and TypeGenie Smart Autocomplete both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Bulk CC & Followers Remover" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
