Ticket History Export vs Harvest

Based on the data on this page, Harvest is the stronger choice for most Zendesk Marketplace support teams — 4.0★ vs Ticket History Export's 1.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

On pricing, Harvest offers a free tier (Free to install) while Ticket History Export starts at $19.99. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.

Harvest has the larger user base (439 reviews vs 1), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Ticket History Export's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage support teams who need fast install and low risk should default to Harvest; mid-market and enterprise support teams with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Ticket History Export's 1-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Harvest's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Zendesk Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Ticket History Export or Harvest cheaper?

Harvest is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free to install). Ticket History Export starts at $19.99. Both publish their pricing on the Zendesk Marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.

Which has better reviews, Ticket History Export or Harvest?

Harvest has the higher average rating (4.0★ from 439 reviews) compared to Ticket History Export (1.0★ from 1 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Ticket History Export or Harvest?

Harvest holds the higher average rating (4.0★ vs 1.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Ticket History Export or Harvest?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Zendesk Marketplace. Harvest has the deeper published review base (439 vs 1), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Zendesk Marketplace support teams?

Ticket History Export typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). Harvest typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (439 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Ticket History Export and Harvest?

Migration support varies by app and category. Ticket History Export and Harvest both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Ticket History Export" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.