| EWWW Image Optimizer | YEP | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | EWWW Image Optimizer | YEP: Optimize YouTube Embeds |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 1.8k | 6 |
| Active installs | 1,000,000+ | 80+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
YEP: Optimize YouTube Embeds edges out EWWW Image Optimizer on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
EWWW Image Optimizer has the larger user base (1,838 reviews vs 6), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. YEP: Optimize YouTube Embeds's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to YEP: Optimize YouTube Embeds; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — EWWW Image Optimizer's 1,838-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than YEP: Optimize YouTube Embeds's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: EWWW Image Optimizer audit • YEP: Optimize YouTube Embeds audit
No tracked changes.
YEP: Optimize YouTube Embeds has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 6 reviews) compared to EWWW Image Optimizer (4.8★ from 1,838 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
YEP: Optimize YouTube Embeds holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. EWWW Image Optimizer has the deeper published review base (1,838 vs 6), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
EWWW Image Optimizer typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1,838 reviews). YEP: Optimize YouTube Embeds typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (6 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. EWWW Image Optimizer and YEP: Optimize YouTube Embeds both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from YEP: Optimize YouTube Embeds" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.