Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Translate WordPress with GTranslate | WPFront User Role Editor | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Translate WordPress with GTranslate | WPFront User Role Editor |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 4.5 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 5k | 65 |
| Active installs | 900,000+ | 30,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Translate WordPress with GTranslate is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory site owners — 4.9★ vs WPFront User Role Editor's 4.5★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Translate WordPress with GTranslate has the larger user base (4,950 reviews vs 65), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. WPFront User Role Editor's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Translate WordPress with GTranslate; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — WPFront User Role Editor's 65-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Translate WordPress with GTranslate's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Translate WordPress with GTranslate audit • WPFront User Role Editor audit
| Keyword | Translate WordPress with GTranslate | WPFront User Role Editor |
|---|---|---|
| live chat | #17 | Not ranked |
| faq | #24 | Not ranked |
| live support | #36 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
Translate WordPress with GTranslate has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 4,950 reviews) compared to WPFront User Role Editor (4.5★ from 65 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Translate WordPress with GTranslate holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 4.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Translate WordPress with GTranslate has the deeper published review base (4,950 vs 65), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Translate WordPress with GTranslate typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (4,950 reviews). WPFront User Role Editor typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (65 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Translate WordPress with GTranslate and WPFront User Role Editor both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from WPFront User Role Editor" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
