Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| WP YouTube Lyte | Yoppli Video Player Design | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | WP YouTube Lyte | Yoppli Video Player Design |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | — |
| Total reviews | 206 | 0 |
| Active installs | 30,000+ | — |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, WP YouTube Lyte is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory merchants — 4.8★ vs Yoppli Video Player Design's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. WP YouTube Lyte has the larger user base (206 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Yoppli Video Player Design's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to WP YouTube Lyte; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Yoppli Video Player Design's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than WP YouTube Lyte's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: WP YouTube Lyte audit • Yoppli Video Player Design audit
| Keyword | WP YouTube Lyte | Yoppli Video Player Design |
|---|---|---|
| faq | #133 | Not ranked |
| feedback form | #377 | Not ranked |
It depends on what you're optimizing for. WP YouTube Lyte fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Yoppli Video Player Design is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. WP YouTube Lyte has more onboarding documentation maturity (206 reviews vs 0), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
WP YouTube Lyte typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (206 reviews). Yoppli Video Player Design aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (0 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. WP YouTube Lyte and Yoppli Video Player Design both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Yoppli Video Player Design" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
