Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Embed Google Fonts | WP YouTube Lyte | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Embed Google Fonts | WP YouTube Lyte |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | 12 | ★ 206 |
| Active installs | 5,000+ | 20,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Embed Google Fonts edges out WP YouTube Lyte on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
WP YouTube Lyte has the larger user base (206 reviews vs 12), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Embed Google Fonts's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Embed Google Fonts; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — WP YouTube Lyte's 206-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Embed Google Fonts's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Embed Google Fonts audit • WP YouTube Lyte audit
| Keyword | Embed Google Fonts | WP YouTube Lyte |
|---|---|---|
| faq | #808 | #149 |
No tracked changes.
Embed Google Fonts has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 12 reviews) compared to WP YouTube Lyte (4.8★ from 206 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Embed Google Fonts holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. WP YouTube Lyte has the deeper published review base (206 vs 12), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Embed Google Fonts typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (12 reviews). WP YouTube Lyte typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (206 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Embed Google Fonts and WP YouTube Lyte both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Embed Google Fonts" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
