Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| LuckyWP ACF Menu Field | WP Widget in Navigation | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | LuckyWP ACF Menu Field | WP Widget in Navigation |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 20 | 15 |
| Active installs | 5,000+ | 3,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
LuckyWP ACF Menu Field edges out WP Widget in Navigation on rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to LuckyWP ACF Menu Field; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — WP Widget in Navigation's 15-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than LuckyWP ACF Menu Field's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: LuckyWP ACF Menu Field audit • WP Widget in Navigation audit
| Keyword | LuckyWP ACF Menu Field | WP Widget in Navigation |
|---|---|---|
| contact | Not ranked | #932 |
LuckyWP ACF Menu Field has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 20 reviews) compared to WP Widget in Navigation (4.7★ from 15 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
LuckyWP ACF Menu Field holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. LuckyWP ACF Menu Field has the deeper published review base (20 vs 15), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
LuckyWP ACF Menu Field typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (20 reviews). WP Widget in Navigation typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (15 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. LuckyWP ACF Menu Field and WP Widget in Navigation both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from WP Widget in Navigation" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
