Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Shortcodes Ultimate – Content Elements | WP Recipe Maker | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | — | |
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
The easy and user-friendly recipe plugin for everyone. Automatic JSON-LD metadata for food AND how-to recipes will improve your SEO!
| Metric | Shortcodes Ultimate – Content Elements | WP Recipe Maker |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.9 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 5.9k | 349 |
| Active installs | 400,000+ | 50,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Shortcodes Ultimate – Content Elements and WP Recipe Maker are evenly matched on rating (4.9★ vs 5.0★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow. Shortcodes Ultimate – Content Elements has the larger user base (5,923 reviews vs 349), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. WP Recipe Maker's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort of orders for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most merchants the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Shortcodes Ultimate – Content Elements audit • WP Recipe Maker audit
| Keyword | Shortcodes Ultimate – Content Elements | WP Recipe Maker |
|---|---|---|
| faq | #7 | Not ranked |
| live support | #32 | Not ranked |
| contact | Not ranked | #622 |
| form builder | Not ranked | #665 |
| custom form | Not ranked | #962 |
No description available.
Shortcodes Ultimate – Content Elements (4.9★, 5,923 reviews) and WP Recipe Maker (5.0★, 349 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Shortcodes Ultimate – Content Elements fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; WP Recipe Maker is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. Shortcodes Ultimate – Content Elements has more onboarding documentation maturity (5,923 reviews vs 349), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Shortcodes Ultimate – Content Elements typically suits established stores with steady traffic based on its review-base composition (5,923 reviews). WP Recipe Maker aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (349 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Shortcodes Ultimate – Content Elements and WP Recipe Maker both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from WP Recipe Maker" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
