Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| CodeKit – Custom Codes Editor | Insert Headers And Footers | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | CodeKit – Custom Codes Editor | Insert Headers And Footers |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 16 | ★ 134 |
| Active installs | 7,000+ | 300,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Insert Headers And Footers edges out CodeKit – Custom Codes Editor on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Insert Headers And Footers has the larger user base (134 reviews vs 16), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. CodeKit – Custom Codes Editor's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Insert Headers And Footers; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — CodeKit – Custom Codes Editor's 16-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Insert Headers And Footers's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: CodeKit – Custom Codes Editor audit • Insert Headers And Footers audit
No tracked changes.
Insert Headers And Footers has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 134 reviews) compared to CodeKit – Custom Codes Editor (4.8★ from 16 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Insert Headers And Footers holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Insert Headers And Footers has the deeper published review base (134 vs 16), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
CodeKit – Custom Codes Editor typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (16 reviews). Insert Headers And Footers typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (134 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. CodeKit – Custom Codes Editor and Insert Headers And Footers both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from CodeKit – Custom Codes Editor" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
