Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Brazilian Market on WooCommerce | Payment Gateway Per Product for WooCommerce | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Brazilian Market on WooCommerce | Payment Gateway Per Product for WooCommerce |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.8 ★ | 3.4 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 515 | 31 |
| Active installs | 70,000+ | 300+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Brazilian Market on WooCommerce is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory merchants — 4.8★ vs Payment Gateway Per Product for WooCommerce's 3.4★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Brazilian Market on WooCommerce has the larger user base (515 reviews vs 31), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Payment Gateway Per Product for WooCommerce's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Brazilian Market on WooCommerce; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Payment Gateway Per Product for WooCommerce's 31-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Brazilian Market on WooCommerce's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Brazilian Market on WooCommerce audit • Payment Gateway Per Product for WooCommerce audit
| Keyword | Brazilian Market on WooCommerce | Payment Gateway Per Product for WooCommerce |
|---|---|---|
| payment form | Not ranked | #286 |
Brazilian Market on WooCommerce has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 515 reviews) compared to Payment Gateway Per Product for WooCommerce (3.4★ from 31 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Brazilian Market on WooCommerce fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Payment Gateway Per Product for WooCommerce is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. Brazilian Market on WooCommerce has more onboarding documentation maturity (515 reviews vs 31), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Brazilian Market on WooCommerce typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (515 reviews). Payment Gateway Per Product for WooCommerce aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (31 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Brazilian Market on WooCommerce and Payment Gateway Per Product for WooCommerce both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Payment Gateway Per Product for WooCommerce" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.