WEBKINDER Integration for Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager vs Insert Headers And Footers

Insert Headers And Footers edges out WEBKINDER Integration for Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. Insert Headers And Footers has the larger user base (133 reviews vs 20), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. WEBKINDER Integration for Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Insert Headers And Footers; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — WEBKINDER Integration for Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager's 20-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Insert Headers And Footers's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Read each app's audit: WEBKINDER Integration for Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager audit • Insert Headers And Footers audit

• Browse the wordpress compare hub
• Browse all wordpress apps
• Compare metrics glossary