Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| UniPAY Payment Gateway For WooCommerce | Wikipedia Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | UniPAY Payment Gateway For WooCommerce | Wikipedia Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | 5 | ★ 38 |
| Active installs | 100+ | 1,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
UniPAY Payment Gateway For WooCommerce edges out Wikipedia Preview on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to UniPAY Payment Gateway For WooCommerce; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Wikipedia Preview's 38-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than UniPAY Payment Gateway For WooCommerce's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: UniPAY Payment Gateway For WooCommerce audit • Wikipedia Preview audit
UniPAY Payment Gateway For WooCommerce has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 5 reviews) compared to Wikipedia Preview (4.8★ from 38 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. UniPAY Payment Gateway For WooCommerce fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Wikipedia Preview is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. Wikipedia Preview has more onboarding documentation maturity (38 reviews vs 5), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
UniPAY Payment Gateway For WooCommerce typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (5 reviews). Wikipedia Preview aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (38 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. UniPAY Payment Gateway For WooCommerce and Wikipedia Preview both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from UniPAY Payment Gateway For WooCommerce" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
