Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Complianz – Terms and Conditions | Widget Display Conditions | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Complianz – Terms and Conditions | Widget Display Conditions |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 185 | 5 |
| Active installs | 300,000+ | 300+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Complianz – Terms and Conditions edges out Widget Display Conditions on rating (4.9★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Complianz – Terms and Conditions has the larger user base (185 reviews vs 5), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Widget Display Conditions's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Complianz – Terms and Conditions; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Widget Display Conditions's 5-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Complianz – Terms and Conditions's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Complianz – Terms and Conditions audit • Widget Display Conditions audit
| Keyword | Complianz – Terms and Conditions | Widget Display Conditions |
|---|---|---|
| contact | #361 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
Complianz – Terms and Conditions has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 185 reviews) compared to Widget Display Conditions (4.8★ from 5 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Complianz – Terms and Conditions holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Complianz – Terms and Conditions has the deeper published review base (185 vs 5), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Complianz – Terms and Conditions typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (185 reviews). Widget Display Conditions typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (5 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Complianz – Terms and Conditions and Widget Display Conditions both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Widget Display Conditions" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
