Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| WF Magnific Lightbox | WP Duplicate posts pages & CPT | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | WF Magnific Lightbox | WP Duplicate posts pages & CPT |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 3.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 12 | 2 |
| Active installs | 1,000+ | 100+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, WF Magnific Lightbox is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory merchants — 5.0★ vs WP Duplicate posts pages & CPT's 3.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to WF Magnific Lightbox; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — WP Duplicate posts pages & CPT's 2-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than WF Magnific Lightbox's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: WF Magnific Lightbox audit • WP Duplicate posts pages & CPT audit
No tracked changes.
WF Magnific Lightbox has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 12 reviews) compared to WP Duplicate posts pages & CPT (3.0★ from 2 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. WF Magnific Lightbox fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; WP Duplicate posts pages & CPT is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. WF Magnific Lightbox has more onboarding documentation maturity (12 reviews vs 2), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
WF Magnific Lightbox typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (12 reviews). WP Duplicate posts pages & CPT aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (2 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. WF Magnific Lightbox and WP Duplicate posts pages & CPT both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from WP Duplicate posts pages & CPT" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
