Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Translate WordPress with GTranslate | Web To PrintQ – Product Designer | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Translate WordPress with GTranslate | Web To PrintQ – Product Designer |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 3.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 5k | 3 |
| Active installs | 900,000+ | 10+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Translate WordPress with GTranslate is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory site owners — 4.9★ vs Web To PrintQ – Product Designer's 3.7★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Translate WordPress with GTranslate has the larger user base (4,950 reviews vs 3), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Web To PrintQ – Product Designer's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Translate WordPress with GTranslate; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Web To PrintQ – Product Designer's 3-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Translate WordPress with GTranslate's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Translate WordPress with GTranslate audit • Web To PrintQ – Product Designer audit
| Keyword | Translate WordPress with GTranslate | Web To PrintQ – Product Designer |
|---|---|---|
| live chat | #17 | Not ranked |
| faq | #24 | Not ranked |
| live support | #36 | Not ranked |
| helpdesk | Not ranked | #290 |
Translate WordPress with GTranslate has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 4,950 reviews) compared to Web To PrintQ – Product Designer (3.7★ from 3 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Translate WordPress with GTranslate holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 3.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Translate WordPress with GTranslate has the deeper published review base (4,950 vs 3), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Translate WordPress with GTranslate typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (4,950 reviews). Web To PrintQ – Product Designer typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Translate WordPress with GTranslate and Web To PrintQ – Product Designer both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Web To PrintQ – Product Designer" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
