Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| WC Minimum Order Amount | PDF Invoices & Packing Slips for WooCommerce | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | WC Minimum Order Amount | PDF Invoices & Packing Slips for WooCommerce |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.2 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 5 | ★ 1.9k |
| Active installs | 3,000+ | 300,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, PDF Invoices & Packing Slips for WooCommerce is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory merchants — 5.0★ vs WC Minimum Order Amount's 4.2★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. PDF Invoices & Packing Slips for WooCommerce has the larger user base (1,857 reviews vs 5), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. WC Minimum Order Amount's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to PDF Invoices & Packing Slips for WooCommerce; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — WC Minimum Order Amount's 5-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than PDF Invoices & Packing Slips for WooCommerce's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: WC Minimum Order Amount audit • PDF Invoices & Packing Slips for WooCommerce audit
| Keyword | WC Minimum Order Amount | PDF Invoices & Packing Slips for WooCommerce |
|---|---|---|
| faq | Not ranked | #30 |
| customer support | Not ranked | #38 |
| custom form | Not ranked | #451 |
PDF Invoices & Packing Slips for WooCommerce has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 1,857 reviews) compared to WC Minimum Order Amount (4.2★ from 5 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. WC Minimum Order Amount fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; PDF Invoices & Packing Slips for WooCommerce is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. PDF Invoices & Packing Slips for WooCommerce has more onboarding documentation maturity (1,857 reviews vs 5), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
WC Minimum Order Amount typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (5 reviews). PDF Invoices & Packing Slips for WooCommerce aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (1,857 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. WC Minimum Order Amount and PDF Invoices & Packing Slips for WooCommerce both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from WC Minimum Order Amount" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
