Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| WP Twitter Auto Publish | WP Review Slider | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | WP Twitter Auto Publish | WP Review Slider |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 205 | 180 |
| Active installs | 4,000+ | 6,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
WP Twitter Auto Publish edges out WP Review Slider on rating (4.9★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to WP Twitter Auto Publish; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — WP Review Slider's 180-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than WP Twitter Auto Publish's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: WP Twitter Auto Publish audit • WP Review Slider audit
| Keyword | WP Twitter Auto Publish | WP Review Slider |
|---|---|---|
| faq | #86 | Not ranked |
| customer support | Not ranked | #274 |
| customer service | Not ranked | #429 |
| contact | #901 | Not ranked |
WP Twitter Auto Publish has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 205 reviews) compared to WP Review Slider (4.8★ from 180 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. WP Twitter Auto Publish fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; WP Review Slider is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. WP Twitter Auto Publish has more onboarding documentation maturity (205 reviews vs 180), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
WP Twitter Auto Publish typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (205 reviews). WP Review Slider aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (180 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. WP Twitter Auto Publish and WP Review Slider both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from WP Review Slider" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
