| ACF | Swiftype Site Search Plugin for WordPress | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | ACF: Better Search | Swiftype Site Search Plugin for WordPress |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 3.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 165 | 24 |
| Active installs | 40,000+ | 400+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, ACF: Better Search is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory site owners — 4.9★ vs Swiftype Site Search Plugin for WordPress's 3.7★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
ACF: Better Search has the larger user base (165 reviews vs 24), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Swiftype Site Search Plugin for WordPress's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to ACF: Better Search; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Swiftype Site Search Plugin for WordPress's 24-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than ACF: Better Search's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: ACF: Better Search audit • Swiftype Site Search Plugin for WordPress audit
| Keyword | ACF | Swiftype Site Search Plugin for WordPress |
|---|---|---|
| faq | #87 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
ACF: Better Search has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 165 reviews) compared to Swiftype Site Search Plugin for WordPress (3.7★ from 24 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
ACF: Better Search holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 3.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. ACF: Better Search has the deeper published review base (165 vs 24), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
ACF: Better Search typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (165 reviews). Swiftype Site Search Plugin for WordPress typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (24 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. ACF: Better Search and Swiftype Site Search Plugin for WordPress both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Swiftype Site Search Plugin for WordPress" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
