Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Embed beautiful, accessible, and interactive tables into your WordPress website’s posts and pages, without having to write code!
Securely upload SVG files to your media library, with built-in sanitization and advanced features for styling and animation.
| Metric | SVG Support | TablePress – Tables in WordPress made easy |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 354 | ★ 4.6k |
| Active installs | 1,000,000+ | 700,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
TablePress – Tables in WordPress made easy edges out SVG Support on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. TablePress – Tables in WordPress made easy has the larger user base (4,622 reviews vs 354), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. SVG Support's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to TablePress – Tables in WordPress made easy; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — SVG Support's 354-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than TablePress – Tables in WordPress made easy's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: SVG Support audit • TablePress – Tables in WordPress made easy audit
| SVG Support | TablePress – Tables in WordPress made easy | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | — | — |
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Keyword | SVG Support | TablePress – Tables in WordPress made easy |
|---|---|---|
| live support | #6 | #48 |
TablePress – Tables in WordPress made easy has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 4,622 reviews) compared to SVG Support (4.8★ from 354 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. SVG Support fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; TablePress – Tables in WordPress made easy is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. TablePress – Tables in WordPress made easy has more onboarding documentation maturity (4,622 reviews vs 354), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
SVG Support typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (354 reviews). TablePress – Tables in WordPress made easy aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (4,622 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. SVG Support and TablePress – Tables in WordPress made easy both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from SVG Support" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.