Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Events Manager Pro – Payment Gateway Selector | Accept Stripe Payments | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Events Manager Pro – Payment Gateway Selector | Accept Stripe Payments |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.1 ★ |
| Total reviews | 2 | ★ 114 |
| Active installs | 20+ | 20,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Events Manager Pro – Payment Gateway Selector is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory merchants — 5.0★ vs Accept Stripe Payments's 4.1★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Accept Stripe Payments has the larger user base (114 reviews vs 2), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Events Manager Pro – Payment Gateway Selector's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Events Manager Pro – Payment Gateway Selector; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Accept Stripe Payments's 114-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Events Manager Pro – Payment Gateway Selector's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Events Manager Pro – Payment Gateway Selector audit • Accept Stripe Payments audit
| Keyword | Events Manager Pro – Payment Gateway Selector | Accept Stripe Payments |
|---|---|---|
| payment form | Not ranked | #49 |
| customer service | Not ranked | #148 |
| customer support | Not ranked | #389 |
Events Manager Pro – Payment Gateway Selector has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 2 reviews) compared to Accept Stripe Payments (4.1★ from 114 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Events Manager Pro – Payment Gateway Selector fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Accept Stripe Payments is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. Accept Stripe Payments has more onboarding documentation maturity (114 reviews vs 2), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Events Manager Pro – Payment Gateway Selector typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (2 reviews). Accept Stripe Payments aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (114 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Events Manager Pro – Payment Gateway Selector and Accept Stripe Payments both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Events Manager Pro – Payment Gateway Selector" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.