| Oceanwp sticky header | WP-PageNavi | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Oceanwp sticky header | WP-PageNavi |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.1 ★ | ★ 4.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | 24 | ★ 149 |
| Active installs | 10,000+ | 500,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, WP-PageNavi is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory merchants — 4.7★ vs Oceanwp sticky header's 4.1★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. WP-PageNavi has the larger user base (149 reviews vs 24), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Oceanwp sticky header's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to WP-PageNavi; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Oceanwp sticky header's 24-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than WP-PageNavi's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Oceanwp sticky header audit • WP-PageNavi audit
WP-PageNavi has the higher average rating (4.7★ from 149 reviews) compared to Oceanwp sticky header (4.1★ from 24 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Oceanwp sticky header fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; WP-PageNavi is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. WP-PageNavi has more onboarding documentation maturity (149 reviews vs 24), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Oceanwp sticky header typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (24 reviews). WP-PageNavi aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (149 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Oceanwp sticky header and WP-PageNavi both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Oceanwp sticky header" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.