Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Snow Monkey Editor | WP Go Maps (formerly WP Google Maps) | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | — | — |
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
The easiest to use Google maps plugin! Create a custom Google map, map block, store locator or map widget with high quality markers containing categor …
| Metric | Snow Monkey Editor | WP Go Maps (formerly WP Google Maps) |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.0 ★ | ★ 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | 5 | ★ 3k |
| Active installs | — | 300,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, WP Go Maps (formerly WP Google Maps) is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory merchants — 4.8★ vs Snow Monkey Editor's 4.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. WP Go Maps (formerly WP Google Maps) has the larger user base (3,006 reviews vs 5), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Snow Monkey Editor's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to WP Go Maps (formerly WP Google Maps); mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Snow Monkey Editor's 5-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than WP Go Maps (formerly WP Google Maps)'s broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Snow Monkey Editor audit • WP Go Maps (formerly WP Google Maps) audit
| Keyword | Snow Monkey Editor | WP Go Maps (formerly WP Google Maps) |
|---|---|---|
| contact | Not ranked | #489 |
WP Go Maps (formerly WP Google Maps) has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 3,006 reviews) compared to Snow Monkey Editor (4.0★ from 5 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Snow Monkey Editor fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; WP Go Maps (formerly WP Google Maps) is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. WP Go Maps (formerly WP Google Maps) has more onboarding documentation maturity (3,006 reviews vs 5), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Snow Monkey Editor typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (5 reviews). WP Go Maps (formerly WP Google Maps) aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (3,006 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Snow Monkey Editor and WP Go Maps (formerly WP Google Maps) both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Snow Monkey Editor" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
