Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Slim Maintenance Mode | WP Custom Admin Interface | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Slim Maintenance Mode | WP Custom Admin Interface |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | 63 | ★ 160 |
| Active installs | 10,000+ | 30,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Slim Maintenance Mode edges out WP Custom Admin Interface on rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. WP Custom Admin Interface has the larger user base (160 reviews vs 63), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Slim Maintenance Mode's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Slim Maintenance Mode; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — WP Custom Admin Interface's 160-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Slim Maintenance Mode's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Slim Maintenance Mode audit • WP Custom Admin Interface audit
| Keyword | Slim Maintenance Mode | WP Custom Admin Interface |
|---|---|---|
| live support | Not ranked | #633 |
Slim Maintenance Mode has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 63 reviews) compared to WP Custom Admin Interface (4.7★ from 160 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Slim Maintenance Mode fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; WP Custom Admin Interface is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. WP Custom Admin Interface has more onboarding documentation maturity (160 reviews vs 63), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Slim Maintenance Mode typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (63 reviews). WP Custom Admin Interface aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (160 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Slim Maintenance Mode and WP Custom Admin Interface both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Slim Maintenance Mode" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
