Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Image Optimizer, Resizer and CDN – Sirv | 站长帮 – WordPress CDN 缓存管理插件 | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Image Optimizer, Resizer and CDN – Sirv | 站长帮 – WordPress CDN 缓存管理插件 |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.9 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 265 | 2 |
| Active installs | 1,000+ | 30+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Image Optimizer, Resizer and CDN – Sirv and 站长帮 – WordPress CDN 缓存管理插件 are evenly matched on rating (4.9★ vs 5.0★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow. Image Optimizer, Resizer and CDN – Sirv has the larger user base (265 reviews vs 2), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. 站长帮 – WordPress CDN 缓存管理插件's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort of orders for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most merchants the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Image Optimizer, Resizer and CDN – Sirv audit • 站长帮 – WordPress CDN 缓存管理插件 audit
Image Optimizer, Resizer and CDN – Sirv (4.9★, 265 reviews) and 站长帮 – WordPress CDN 缓存管理插件 (5.0★, 2 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Image Optimizer, Resizer and CDN – Sirv fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; 站长帮 – WordPress CDN 缓存管理插件 is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. Image Optimizer, Resizer and CDN – Sirv has more onboarding documentation maturity (265 reviews vs 2), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Image Optimizer, Resizer and CDN – Sirv typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (265 reviews). 站长帮 – WordPress CDN 缓存管理插件 aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (2 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Image Optimizer, Resizer and CDN – Sirv and 站长帮 – WordPress CDN 缓存管理插件 both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from 站长帮 – WordPress CDN 缓存管理插件" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
