Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Simple Statistics for Feeds | Wp Post Views – WordPress Post views counter | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Simple Statistics for Feeds | Wp Post Views – WordPress Post views counter |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.8 ★ | 4.3 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 58 | 6 |
| Active installs | 800+ | 4,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Simple Statistics for Feeds is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory merchants — 4.8★ vs Wp Post Views – WordPress Post views counter's 4.3★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Simple Statistics for Feeds; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Wp Post Views – WordPress Post views counter's 6-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Simple Statistics for Feeds's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Simple Statistics for Feeds audit • Wp Post Views – WordPress Post views counter audit
| Keyword | Simple Statistics for Feeds | Wp Post Views – WordPress Post views counter |
|---|---|---|
| chat bot | #117 | Not ranked |
| feedback form | #907 | Not ranked |
Simple Statistics for Feeds has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 58 reviews) compared to Wp Post Views – WordPress Post views counter (4.3★ from 6 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Simple Statistics for Feeds fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Wp Post Views – WordPress Post views counter is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. Simple Statistics for Feeds has more onboarding documentation maturity (58 reviews vs 6), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Simple Statistics for Feeds typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (58 reviews). Wp Post Views – WordPress Post views counter aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (6 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Simple Statistics for Feeds and Wp Post Views – WordPress Post views counter both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Wp Post Views – WordPress Post views counter" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.