Simple Custom CSS Plugin vs Unused Shortcodes

Unused Shortcodes edges out Simple Custom CSS Plugin on rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.

Simple Custom CSS Plugin has the larger user base (159 reviews vs 4), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Unused Shortcodes's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Unused Shortcodes; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Simple Custom CSS Plugin's 159-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Unused Shortcodes's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Which has better reviews, Simple Custom CSS Plugin or Unused Shortcodes?

Unused Shortcodes has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 4 reviews) compared to Simple Custom CSS Plugin (4.7★ from 159 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Simple Custom CSS Plugin or Unused Shortcodes?

Unused Shortcodes holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Simple Custom CSS Plugin or Unused Shortcodes?

Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Simple Custom CSS Plugin has the deeper published review base (159 vs 4), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large WordPress Plugin Directory site owners?

Simple Custom CSS Plugin typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (159 reviews). Unused Shortcodes typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (4 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Simple Custom CSS Plugin and Unused Shortcodes?

Migration support varies by app and category. Simple Custom CSS Plugin and Unused Shortcodes both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Unused Shortcodes" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.