Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| WMS with Pulpo WMS | Wanderlust OCA para WooCommerce | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | WMS with Pulpo WMS | Wanderlust OCA para WooCommerce |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | 1 | ★ 58 |
| Active installs | — | 500+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
WMS with Pulpo WMS edges out Wanderlust OCA para WooCommerce on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to WMS with Pulpo WMS; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Wanderlust OCA para WooCommerce's 58-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than WMS with Pulpo WMS's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: WMS with Pulpo WMS audit • Wanderlust OCA para WooCommerce audit
WMS with Pulpo WMS has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 1 reviews) compared to Wanderlust OCA para WooCommerce (4.8★ from 58 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. WMS with Pulpo WMS fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Wanderlust OCA para WooCommerce is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. Wanderlust OCA para WooCommerce has more onboarding documentation maturity (58 reviews vs 1), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
WMS with Pulpo WMS typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (1 reviews). Wanderlust OCA para WooCommerce aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (58 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. WMS with Pulpo WMS and Wanderlust OCA para WooCommerce both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from WMS with Pulpo WMS" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
