Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Social Sharing Plugin – Sassy Social Share | Social Share Button | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Social Sharing Plugin – Sassy Social Share | Social Share Button |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.8 ★ | 4.1 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 521 | 17 |
| Active installs | 100,000+ | 1,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Social Sharing Plugin – Sassy Social Share is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory merchants — 4.8★ vs Social Share Button's 4.1★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Social Sharing Plugin – Sassy Social Share has the larger user base (521 reviews vs 17), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Social Share Button's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Social Sharing Plugin – Sassy Social Share; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Social Share Button's 17-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Social Sharing Plugin – Sassy Social Share's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Social Sharing Plugin – Sassy Social Share audit • Social Share Button audit
| Keyword | Social Sharing Plugin – Sassy Social Share | Social Share Button |
|---|---|---|
| feedback form | #585 | Not ranked |
| contact | Not ranked | #669 |
| online form | #779 | Not ranked |
| live support | Not ranked | #779 |
| online forms | #780 | Not ranked |
Social Sharing Plugin – Sassy Social Share has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 521 reviews) compared to Social Share Button (4.1★ from 17 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Social Sharing Plugin – Sassy Social Share fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Social Share Button is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. Social Sharing Plugin – Sassy Social Share has more onboarding documentation maturity (521 reviews vs 17), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Social Sharing Plugin – Sassy Social Share typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (521 reviews). Social Share Button aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (17 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Social Sharing Plugin – Sassy Social Share and Social Share Button both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Social Share Button" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
