ACF vs Relevant Search

Based on the data on this page, ACF: Better Search is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory site owners — 4.9★ vs Relevant Search's 3.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

ACF: Better Search has the larger user base (165 reviews vs 1), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Relevant Search's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to ACF: Better Search; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Relevant Search's 1-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than ACF: Better Search's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Which has better reviews, ACF: Better Search or Relevant Search?

ACF: Better Search has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 165 reviews) compared to Relevant Search (3.0★ from 1 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose ACF: Better Search or Relevant Search?

ACF: Better Search holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 3.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, ACF: Better Search or Relevant Search?

Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. ACF: Better Search has the deeper published review base (165 vs 1), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large WordPress Plugin Directory site owners?

ACF: Better Search typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (165 reviews). Relevant Search typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between ACF: Better Search and Relevant Search?

Migration support varies by app and category. ACF: Better Search and Relevant Search both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Relevant Search" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.