Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Translate WordPress with GTranslate | Regenerate Thumbnails | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | — | |
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
Regenerate the thumbnails for one or more of your image uploads. Useful when changing their sizes or your theme.
| Metric | Translate WordPress with GTranslate | Regenerate Thumbnails |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 4.6 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 4.9k | 395 |
| Active installs | 900,000+ | — |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Translate WordPress with GTranslate is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory merchants — 4.9★ vs Regenerate Thumbnails's 4.6★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Translate WordPress with GTranslate has the larger user base (4,918 reviews vs 395), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Regenerate Thumbnails's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Translate WordPress with GTranslate; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Regenerate Thumbnails's 395-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Translate WordPress with GTranslate's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Translate WordPress with GTranslate audit • Regenerate Thumbnails audit
| Keyword | Translate WordPress with GTranslate | Regenerate Thumbnails |
|---|---|---|
| live chat | #15 | Not ranked |
| faq | #22 | Not ranked |
| customer service | #29 | Not ranked |
No description available.
Translate WordPress with GTranslate has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 4,918 reviews) compared to Regenerate Thumbnails (4.6★ from 395 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Translate WordPress with GTranslate fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Regenerate Thumbnails is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. Translate WordPress with GTranslate has more onboarding documentation maturity (4,918 reviews vs 395), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Translate WordPress with GTranslate typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (4,918 reviews). Regenerate Thumbnails aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (395 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Translate WordPress with GTranslate and Regenerate Thumbnails both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Regenerate Thumbnails" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
