Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Fixed Widget and Sticky Elements for WordPress | The Prospect Farmer | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Fixed Widget and Sticky Elements for WordPress | The Prospect Farmer |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.7 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 261 | 1 |
| Active installs | 80,000+ | 10+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
The Prospect Farmer edges out Fixed Widget and Sticky Elements for WordPress on rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Fixed Widget and Sticky Elements for WordPress has the larger user base (261 reviews vs 1), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. The Prospect Farmer's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to The Prospect Farmer; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Fixed Widget and Sticky Elements for WordPress's 261-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than The Prospect Farmer's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Fixed Widget and Sticky Elements for WordPress audit • The Prospect Farmer audit
The Prospect Farmer has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 1 reviews) compared to Fixed Widget and Sticky Elements for WordPress (4.7★ from 261 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
The Prospect Farmer holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Fixed Widget and Sticky Elements for WordPress has the deeper published review base (261 vs 1), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Fixed Widget and Sticky Elements for WordPress typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (261 reviews). The Prospect Farmer typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Fixed Widget and Sticky Elements for WordPress and The Prospect Farmer both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from The Prospect Farmer" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
