Concise Antispam vs Pixeline's Email — WordPress

Concise Antispam vs Pixeline's

Name: Concise Antispam
Rating: 5 (2 reviews)

Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points

Concise Antispam

5.0·2reviews·20+installs

wordpress

Change

1. Listing metadata

Field-level data

	Concise Antispam	Pixeline's
Tagline	—	—
Description	892 / 5000 chars18% used	2655 / 5000 chars53% used
Screenshots	—	—
Languages
Platforms	WordPress	WordPress
Developer	Concise Studio	pixeline
Listed	—	—
Last updated	—	—

2. Categories & rankings

Shared categories on the same row · in-category position inline

Concise Antispam

Pixeline's

Shared

At a glance

4 metrics · auto-computed

Feature comparison between Concise Antispam and Pixeline's Email Protector
Metric	Concise Antispam	Pixeline's Email Protector
Rating	★ 5.0 ★	4.3 ★
Total reviews	2	★ 8
Active installs	20+	800+
Free plan	—	—

4. App details

Long-form description · keyword frequency

Concise Antispam

Algorithm Plugin generates token on the backend side. Plugin adds hidden field for token in each form which will use method “POST” after rendering of the page. Plugin inserts token in the field after user’s interaction with site. For developers Antispam will automatically check submissions of the regular forms but ignores all AJAX requests. If you want to change this behaviour, you can use filter concise_antispam_need_to_validate_token. See example: Disable Antispam for some forms: add_filter("concise_antispam_need_to_validate_token", function($needToValidateToken) { if (!empty($_POST['do-not-check-antispam-token'])) { $needToValidateToken = false; } return $needToValidateToken; }); You can also always manually call \Concise\Antispam::validateTokenOrDie() in your custom handler. Formidable Forms integration For proper work disable the honeypot checking in the forms

Top keywords

antispam5×4.07%
token5×4.07%
forms4×3.25%
concise3×2.44%
concise antispam3×2.44%
needtovalidatetoken3×2.44%
disable2×1.63%
field2×1.63%
filter2×1.63%
filter concise2×1.63%
filter concise antispam2×1.63%
post2×1.63%

Pixeline's

This plugin provides an unobtrusive yet efficient protection against email harvesters / spambots. Post/page authors may write email addresses in their article in the usual format (“[email protected]”) without exposing them to spam email harvesters. The plugin takes care of the obfuscation, implementing a graceful degradation technique focusing on usability so as to protect your email addresses from harvesters while keeping them usable to your human visitors. The plugin replaces any email address found in posts, pages, comments and excerpts, and replace them by a bit of html markup that should deceive most email harvesters: john(replace the parenthesis by @)doe.com . If javascript is available, it will display a clickable link and display the original email to the human user. Maximum usability, maximum protection. Please rate the plugin if you like it. Usage Write your email addresses inside your posts and pages as usual. When the plugin is activated, it will replace them by a human-readable html string that explains how to deduce the email address, and if javascript is available (99.9% of the time), the original email address will be displayed as a clickable mailto: link. For example: Hello [email protected]. How are you today? will become John( replace these parenthesis by @ )doe.com. Additionally, you can specify what the mailto: link should look like by sticking a parenthesis inside of which you put the visible link text, like this: Hello [email protected](John Doe). How are you today? will become John( replace these parenthesis by @ )doe.com. inside a theme If you need to protect emails inside your Theme’s files (like the footer.php for example), you can use the function safe_email() like this: echo safe_email('[email protected]'); Theme-safe alternative (plugin can be disabled) If your theme must keep working even when this plugin is disabled, use a wrapper in your theme (for example in functions.php) and call that wrapper everywhere instead of calling safe_email() directly. if ( ! function_exists( 'theme_safe_email' ) ) { function theme_safe_email( $email, $label = '' ) { $email = sanitize_email( $email ); if ( '' === $email ) { return ''; } if ( function_exists( 'safe_email' ) ) { $payload = $email . ( '' !== $label ? '(' . $label . ')' : '' ); return safe_email( $payload ); } $encoded_email = antispambot( $email ); $link_label = '' !== $label ? $label : $encoded_email; return ' ' . esc_html( $link_label ) . ' '; } } Contribute Github repo: https://github.com/pixeline/pixeline-email-protector

Top keywords

email24×6.03%
com7×1.76%

Frequently asked

Common questions about this comparison

Which has better reviews, Concise Antispam or Pixeline's Email Protector?

Concise Antispam has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 2 reviews) compared to Pixeline's Email Protector (4.3★ from 8 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Concise Antispam or Pixeline's Email Protector?

Concise Antispam holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.3★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Concise Antispam or Pixeline's Email Protector?

Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Pixeline's Email Protector has the deeper published review base (8 vs 2), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large WordPress Plugin Directory site owners?

Concise Antispam typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (2 reviews). Pixeline's Email Protector typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (8 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Concise Antispam and Pixeline's Email Protector?

Migration support varies by app and category. Concise Antispam and Pixeline's Email Protector both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Concise Antispam" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.

Concise Antispam vs Pixeline's

Concise Antispam

1. Listing metadata

2. Categories & rankings

Pixeline's

At a glance

AppRanks verdict

3. Activity in the last 90 days

Concise Antispam · 0 changes

Pixeline's · 2 changes

4. App details

Frequently asked

Which has better reviews, Concise Antispam or Pixeline's Email Protector?

Should I choose Concise Antispam or Pixeline's Email Protector?

Which is faster to set up, Concise Antispam or Pixeline's Email Protector?

Which works better for small vs large WordPress Plugin Directory site owners?

Can I migrate data between Concise Antispam and Pixeline's Email Protector?

See full keyword rankings, install trends, and weekly alerts

More popular comparisons