Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| LoginWP (Formerly Peter's Login Redirect) | WC Quick Customer Redirects | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | LoginWP (Formerly Peter's Login Redirect) | WC Quick Customer Redirects |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 499 | 1 |
| Active installs | 90,000+ | 40+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
WC Quick Customer Redirects edges out LoginWP (Formerly Peter's Login Redirect) on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. LoginWP (Formerly Peter's Login Redirect) has the larger user base (499 reviews vs 1), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. WC Quick Customer Redirects's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to WC Quick Customer Redirects; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — LoginWP (Formerly Peter's Login Redirect)'s 499-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than WC Quick Customer Redirects's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: LoginWP (Formerly Peter's Login Redirect) audit • WC Quick Customer Redirects audit
| Keyword | LoginWP (Formerly Peter's Login Redirect) | WC Quick Customer Redirects |
|---|---|---|
| customer support | Not ranked | #142 |
| form | #262 | Not ranked |
| forms | #484 | Not ranked |
| custom form | #720 | Not ranked |
WC Quick Customer Redirects has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 1 reviews) compared to LoginWP (Formerly Peter's Login Redirect) (4.8★ from 499 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. LoginWP (Formerly Peter's Login Redirect) fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; WC Quick Customer Redirects is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. LoginWP (Formerly Peter's Login Redirect) has more onboarding documentation maturity (499 reviews vs 1), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
LoginWP (Formerly Peter's Login Redirect) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (499 reviews). WC Quick Customer Redirects aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (1 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. LoginWP (Formerly Peter's Login Redirect) and WC Quick Customer Redirects both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from WC Quick Customer Redirects" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.