Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Performance Lab | Site Health Manager | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Performance Lab | Site Health Manager |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.3 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 51 | 4 |
| Active installs | 100,000+ | 100+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Site Health Manager is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory site owners — 5.0★ vs Performance Lab's 4.3★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Site Health Manager; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Performance Lab's 51-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Site Health Manager's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Performance Lab audit • Site Health Manager audit
No tracked changes.
Site Health Manager has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 4 reviews) compared to Performance Lab (4.3★ from 51 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Site Health Manager holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.3★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Performance Lab has the deeper published review base (51 vs 4), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Performance Lab typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (51 reviews). Site Health Manager typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (4 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Performance Lab and Site Health Manager both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Site Health Manager" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
