Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Contact Form 7 – Post Fields | PDF Forms Filler for CF7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Contact Form 7 – Post Fields | PDF Forms Filler for CF7 |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 34 | 13 |
| Active installs | 3,000+ | 3,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Contact Form 7 – Post Fields edges out PDF Forms Filler for CF7 on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Contact Form 7 – Post Fields; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — PDF Forms Filler for CF7's 13-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Contact Form 7 – Post Fields's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Contact Form 7 – Post Fields audit • PDF Forms Filler for CF7 audit
| Keyword | Contact Form 7 – Post Fields | PDF Forms Filler for CF7 |
|---|---|---|
| contact form | #90 | #96 |
| form | #164 | #59 |
| contact | #85 | #164 |
| forms | #306 | #37 |
Contact Form 7 – Post Fields has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 34 reviews) compared to PDF Forms Filler for CF7 (4.8★ from 13 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Contact Form 7 – Post Fields holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Contact Form 7 – Post Fields has the deeper published review base (34 vs 13), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Contact Form 7 – Post Fields typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (34 reviews). PDF Forms Filler for CF7 typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (13 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Contact Form 7 – Post Fields and PDF Forms Filler for CF7 both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from PDF Forms Filler for CF7" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
