Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Payment gateway | TablePress – Tables in WordPress made easy | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Payment gateway: accept.blue for WooCommerce | TablePress – Tables in WordPress made easy |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.6 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 8 | ★ 4.6k |
| Active installs | 100+ | 600,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, TablePress – Tables in WordPress made easy is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory site owners — 5.0★ vs Payment gateway: accept.blue for WooCommerce's 3.6★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
TablePress – Tables in WordPress made easy has the larger user base (4,626 reviews vs 8), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Payment gateway: accept.blue for WooCommerce's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to TablePress – Tables in WordPress made easy; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Payment gateway: accept.blue for WooCommerce's 8-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than TablePress – Tables in WordPress made easy's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Payment gateway: accept.blue for WooCommerce audit • TablePress – Tables in WordPress made easy audit
| Keyword | Payment gateway | TablePress – Tables in WordPress made easy |
|---|---|---|
| faq | Not ranked | #28 |
| live support | Not ranked | #62 |
| payment form | #253 | Not ranked |
TablePress – Tables in WordPress made easy has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 4,626 reviews) compared to Payment gateway: accept.blue for WooCommerce (3.6★ from 8 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
TablePress – Tables in WordPress made easy holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 3.6★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. TablePress – Tables in WordPress made easy has the deeper published review base (4,626 vs 8), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Payment gateway: accept.blue for WooCommerce typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (8 reviews). TablePress – Tables in WordPress made easy typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (4,626 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Payment gateway: accept.blue for WooCommerce and TablePress – Tables in WordPress made easy both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Payment gateway: accept.blue for WooCommerce" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
