Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Aceite diversos métodos de pagamento de forma simples e segura utilizando o Pagar.me!
| Pagar.me para WooCommerce | Claudio Sanches – PagSeguro for WooCommerce | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | — | — |
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Pagar.me para WooCommerce | Claudio Sanches – PagSeguro for WooCommerce |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 2.5 ★ | ★ 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 46 | ★ 913 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Claudio Sanches – PagSeguro for WooCommerce is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory merchants — 4.9★ vs Pagar.me para WooCommerce's 2.5★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Claudio Sanches – PagSeguro for WooCommerce has the larger user base (913 reviews vs 46), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Pagar.me para WooCommerce's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Claudio Sanches – PagSeguro for WooCommerce; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Pagar.me para WooCommerce's 46-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Claudio Sanches – PagSeguro for WooCommerce's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Pagar.me para WooCommerce audit • Claudio Sanches – PagSeguro for WooCommerce audit
Claudio Sanches – PagSeguro for WooCommerce has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 913 reviews) compared to Pagar.me para WooCommerce (2.5★ from 46 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Pagar.me para WooCommerce fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Claudio Sanches – PagSeguro for WooCommerce is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. Claudio Sanches – PagSeguro for WooCommerce has more onboarding documentation maturity (913 reviews vs 46), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Pagar.me para WooCommerce typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (46 reviews). Claudio Sanches – PagSeguro for WooCommerce aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (913 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Pagar.me para WooCommerce and Claudio Sanches – PagSeguro for WooCommerce both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Pagar.me para WooCommerce" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
