Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Packlink PRO for WooCommerce | Print Label and Tracking Code for GLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Packlink PRO for WooCommerce | Print Label and Tracking Code for GLS |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.5 ★ | 2.2 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 262 | 5 |
| Active installs | 20,000+ | 80+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Packlink PRO for WooCommerce is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory merchants — 4.5★ vs Print Label and Tracking Code for GLS's 2.2★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Packlink PRO for WooCommerce has the larger user base (262 reviews vs 5), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Print Label and Tracking Code for GLS's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Packlink PRO for WooCommerce; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Print Label and Tracking Code for GLS's 5-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Packlink PRO for WooCommerce's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Packlink PRO for WooCommerce audit • Print Label and Tracking Code for GLS audit
| Keyword | Packlink PRO for WooCommerce | Print Label and Tracking Code for GLS |
|---|---|---|
| customer service | #188 | Not ranked |
| customer support | #383 | Not ranked |
| contact | #501 | Not ranked |
Packlink PRO for WooCommerce has the higher average rating (4.5★ from 262 reviews) compared to Print Label and Tracking Code for GLS (2.2★ from 5 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Packlink PRO for WooCommerce fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Print Label and Tracking Code for GLS is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. Packlink PRO for WooCommerce has more onboarding documentation maturity (262 reviews vs 5), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Packlink PRO for WooCommerce typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (262 reviews). Print Label and Tracking Code for GLS aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (5 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Packlink PRO for WooCommerce and Print Label and Tracking Code for GLS both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Print Label and Tracking Code for GLS" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
