| Duplicate Menu | Oomph Clone Widgets | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Duplicate Menu | Oomph Clone Widgets |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.6 ★ | 4.3 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 104 | 26 |
| Active installs | 100,000+ | 300+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Duplicate Menu edges out Oomph Clone Widgets on rating (4.6★ vs 4.3★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Duplicate Menu has the larger user base (104 reviews vs 26), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Oomph Clone Widgets's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Duplicate Menu; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Oomph Clone Widgets's 26-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Duplicate Menu's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Duplicate Menu audit • Oomph Clone Widgets audit
| Keyword | Duplicate Menu | Oomph Clone Widgets |
|---|---|---|
| live support | #506 | Not ranked |
Duplicate Menu has the higher average rating (4.6★ from 104 reviews) compared to Oomph Clone Widgets (4.3★ from 26 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Duplicate Menu holds the higher average rating (4.6★ vs 4.3★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Duplicate Menu has the deeper published review base (104 vs 26), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Duplicate Menu typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (104 reviews). Oomph Clone Widgets typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (26 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Duplicate Menu and Oomph Clone Widgets both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Oomph Clone Widgets" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.