Side-by-side comparison
| Metric | oEmbed Plus | Responsive Videos by Angie Makes |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.6 ★ |
| Total reviews | 7 | ★ 10 |
| Active installs | 4,000+ | 600+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
On the measured data here, oEmbed Plus leads on more dimensions (2 vs 0). Pick Responsive Videos by Angie Makes if one of the points where it leads is what you need.
Built only from the WordPress Plugin Directory listing data shown on this page. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparisons. Read the methodology
Read each app's audit: oEmbed Plus audit • Responsive Videos by Angie Makes audit
| Field | oEmbed Plus | Responsive Videos by Angie Makes |
|---|---|---|
| Platforms | ||
| Developer |
oEmbed Plus has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 7 reviews) compared to Responsive Videos by Angie Makes (4.6★ from 10 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
oEmbed Plus holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.6★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly; Responsive Videos by Angie Makes has more published reviews to read for user-reported install experience (10 vs 7).
AppRanks cannot say which fits a larger or smaller operation — there is no store-size measurement in the WordPress Plugin Directory data. What it can show: oEmbed Plus has 7 published reviews; Responsive Videos by Angie Makes has 10 published reviews. Compare plan limits and pricing tiers against your own volume.
Migration support varies by app and category. oEmbed Plus and Responsive Videos by Angie Makes both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from oEmbed Plus" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.