Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Autocomplete Search | Ninoxa Live Search | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Autocomplete Search | Ninoxa Live Search |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0 ★ | — |
| Total reviews | 1 | 0 |
| Active installs | 20+ | — |
| Free plan | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Autocomplete Search is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory site owners — 5.0★ vs Ninoxa Live Search's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Autocomplete Search; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Ninoxa Live Search's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Autocomplete Search's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Autocomplete Search audit • Ninoxa Live Search audit
No tracked changes.
Autocomplete Search holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 0.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Autocomplete Search has the deeper published review base (1 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Autocomplete Search typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). Ninoxa Live Search typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Autocomplete Search and Ninoxa Live Search both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Ninoxa Live Search" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
