Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Mouseflow for WordPress | Post Views Counter | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Mouseflow for WordPress | Post Views Counter |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.8 ★ | ★ 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 6 | ★ 1.2k |
| Active installs | 7,000+ | 200,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Post Views Counter is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory site owners — 4.9★ vs Mouseflow for WordPress's 3.8★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Post Views Counter has the larger user base (1,225 reviews vs 6), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Mouseflow for WordPress's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Post Views Counter; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Mouseflow for WordPress's 6-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Post Views Counter's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Mouseflow for WordPress audit • Post Views Counter audit
| Keyword | Mouseflow for WordPress | Post Views Counter |
|---|---|---|
| live support | Not ranked | #250 |
| ai agent | Not ranked | #672 |
No tracked changes.
Post Views Counter has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 1,225 reviews) compared to Mouseflow for WordPress (3.8★ from 6 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Post Views Counter holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 3.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Post Views Counter has the deeper published review base (1,225 vs 6), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Mouseflow for WordPress typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (6 reviews). Post Views Counter typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1,225 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Mouseflow for WordPress and Post Views Counter both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Mouseflow for WordPress" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
