| Custom Fields Shortcodes | Meta Box | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Custom Fields Shortcodes | Meta Box |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | 1 | ★ 165 |
| Active installs | 100+ | 500,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Custom Fields Shortcodes edges out Meta Box on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Meta Box has the larger user base (165 reviews vs 1), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Custom Fields Shortcodes's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Custom Fields Shortcodes; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Meta Box's 165-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Custom Fields Shortcodes's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Custom Fields Shortcodes audit • Meta Box audit
| Keyword | Custom Fields Shortcodes | Meta Box |
|---|---|---|
| custom form | Not ranked | #398 |
| form builder | Not ranked | #458 |
| forms | Not ranked | #746 |
No tracked changes.
Custom Fields Shortcodes has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 1 reviews) compared to Meta Box (4.8★ from 165 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Custom Fields Shortcodes holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Meta Box has the deeper published review base (165 vs 1), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Custom Fields Shortcodes typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). Meta Box typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (165 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Custom Fields Shortcodes and Meta Box both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Custom Fields Shortcodes" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.