Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Master Slider – Responsive Touch Slider | WP Owl Carousel | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Master Slider – Responsive Touch Slider | WP Owl Carousel |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.6 ★ | 4.3 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 503 | 4 |
| Active installs | 60,000+ | 200+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Master Slider – Responsive Touch Slider edges out WP Owl Carousel on rating (4.6★ vs 4.3★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Master Slider – Responsive Touch Slider has the larger user base (503 reviews vs 4), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. WP Owl Carousel's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Master Slider – Responsive Touch Slider; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — WP Owl Carousel's 4-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Master Slider – Responsive Touch Slider's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Master Slider – Responsive Touch Slider audit • WP Owl Carousel audit
Master Slider – Responsive Touch Slider has the higher average rating (4.6★ from 503 reviews) compared to WP Owl Carousel (4.3★ from 4 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Master Slider – Responsive Touch Slider holds the higher average rating (4.6★ vs 4.3★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. Master Slider – Responsive Touch Slider has the deeper published review base (503 vs 4), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Master Slider – Responsive Touch Slider typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (503 reviews). WP Owl Carousel typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (4 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Master Slider – Responsive Touch Slider and WP Owl Carousel both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from WP Owl Carousel" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
