Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| MAS Brands for WooCommerce | Perfect Brands for WooCommerce | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | MAS Brands for WooCommerce | Perfect Brands for WooCommerce |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 4.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 415 |
| Active installs | 10,000+ | 40,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
Based on the data on this page, Perfect Brands for WooCommerce is the stronger choice for most WordPress Plugin Directory merchants — 4.7★ vs MAS Brands for WooCommerce's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Perfect Brands for WooCommerce has the larger user base (415 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. MAS Brands for WooCommerce's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Perfect Brands for WooCommerce; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — MAS Brands for WooCommerce's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Perfect Brands for WooCommerce's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: MAS Brands for WooCommerce audit • Perfect Brands for WooCommerce audit
| Keyword | MAS Brands for WooCommerce | Perfect Brands for WooCommerce |
|---|---|---|
| customer support | Not ranked | #181 |
It depends on what you're optimizing for. MAS Brands for WooCommerce fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Perfect Brands for WooCommerce is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory marketplace. Perfect Brands for WooCommerce has more onboarding documentation maturity (415 reviews vs 0), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
MAS Brands for WooCommerce typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (0 reviews). Perfect Brands for WooCommerce aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (415 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. MAS Brands for WooCommerce and Perfect Brands for WooCommerce both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from MAS Brands for WooCommerce" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
