| MC4WP | Selection Sharer by Hans van Gent | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | — | — |
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | MC4WP: Mailchimp for WordPress | Selection Sharer by Hans van Gent |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 1.5k | 21 |
| Active installs | 1,000,000+ | 2,000+ |
| Free plan | — | — |
Selection Sharer by Hans van Gent edges out MC4WP: Mailchimp for WordPress on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
MC4WP: Mailchimp for WordPress has the larger user base (1,497 reviews vs 21), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Selection Sharer by Hans van Gent's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Selection Sharer by Hans van Gent; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — MC4WP: Mailchimp for WordPress's 1,497-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Selection Sharer by Hans van Gent's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WordPress Plugin Directory listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: MC4WP: Mailchimp for WordPress audit • Selection Sharer by Hans van Gent audit
| Keyword | MC4WP | Selection Sharer by Hans van Gent |
|---|---|---|
| forms | #100 | Not ranked |
| form | #111 | Not ranked |
| custom form | #158 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
Selection Sharer by Hans van Gent has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 21 reviews) compared to MC4WP: Mailchimp for WordPress (4.8★ from 1,497 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Selection Sharer by Hans van Gent holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WordPress Plugin Directory. MC4WP: Mailchimp for WordPress has the deeper published review base (1,497 vs 21), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
MC4WP: Mailchimp for WordPress typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1,497 reviews). Selection Sharer by Hans van Gent typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (21 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. MC4WP: Mailchimp for WordPress and Selection Sharer by Hans van Gent both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Selection Sharer by Hans van Gent" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
